A10G vs CMP 30HX for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and CMP 30HX 6 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 318.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
A10G 24 GB
319% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
300% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Lowest power draw
CMP 30HX 6 GB
17% lower rating than A10G 24 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A10G 24 GB | CMP 30HX 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 +319% | 765.06 |
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+300% | 6 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−33% |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 9,216 +555% | 1,408 |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 1785 MHz +4% |
| RT cores | 72 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s +79% | 336 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +100% | 192-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 150 W | 125 W −17% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
CMP 30HX 6 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 12 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
A10G 24 GB leads by 318.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,205 vs 765). CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
CMP 30HX 6 GB is the lower-power option at 125 W TDP, compared with 150 W for A10G 24 GB. If render speed is close, that can make CMP 30HX 6 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 318.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: A10G 24 GB 319% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 300% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Lowest power draw: CMP 30HX 6 GB 17% lower rating than A10G 24 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.