A10G vs H200 NVL for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and H200 NVL 141 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. H200 NVL 141 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 79.7%.
Fastest in Cycles
H200 NVL 141 GB
80% faster than A10G 24 GB
Most VRAM
H200 NVL 141 GB
488% more VRAM than A10G 24 GB
Lowest power draw
A10G 24 GB
75% lower rating than H200 NVL 141 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 | 5,760.19 +80% |
| CUDA cores | 9,216 | 16,896 +83% |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 1785 MHz +4% |
| RT cores | 72 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 | 528 +83% |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes | 141 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+488% |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s | 4,890 GB/s +715% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | N/A |
| Memory bus | 384-bit | 6144-bit +1,500% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Hopper |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 150 W −75% | 600 W |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion−55% | 1000 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2024 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
H200 NVL 141 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 9 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
H200 NVL 141 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
H200 NVL 141 GB leads by 79.7% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (5,760 vs 3,205). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
H200 NVL 141 GB has more scene headroom with 141 GB of VRAM versus 24 GB on A10G 24 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A10G 24 GB is the lower-power option at 150 W TDP, compared with 600 W for H200 NVL 141 GB. If render speed is close, that can make A10G 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
H200 NVL 141 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose A10G 24 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
H200 NVL 141 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 79.7%.
Fastest in Cycles: H200 NVL 141 GB 80% faster than A10G 24 GB.
Most VRAM: H200 NVL 141 GB 488% more VRAM than A10G 24 GB.
Lowest power draw: A10G 24 GB 75% lower rating than H200 NVL 141 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A10G 24 GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while H200 NVL 141 GB has 141 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.