A10G vs MX350 for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and MX350 2 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 3370.6%.
Fastest in Cycles
A10G 24 GB
3,371% faster than MX350 2 GB
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
1,100% more VRAM than MX350 2 GB
Lowest power draw
MX350 2 GB
87% lower rating than A10G 24 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A10G 24 GB | MX350 2 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 +3,371% | 92.34 |
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+1,100% | 2 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 9,216 +1,340% | 640 |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz +82% | 937 MHz |
| RT cores | 72 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s +971% | 56.06 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +500% | 64-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 150 W | 20 W −87% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
MX350 2 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 7 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
A10G 24 GB leads by 3370.6% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,205 vs 92). MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
MX350 2 GB is the lower-power option at 20 W TDP, compared with 150 W for A10G 24 GB. If render speed is close, that can make MX350 2 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 3370.6%.
Fastest in Cycles: A10G 24 GB 3,371% faster than MX350 2 GB.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 1,100% more VRAM than MX350 2 GB.
Lowest power draw: MX350 2 GB 87% lower rating than A10G 24 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.