A10G vs Pro W5500 for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and Pro W5500 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 530.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
A10G 24 GB
530% faster than Pro W5500 8 GB
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
200% more VRAM than Pro W5500 8 GB
Lowest power draw
Pro W5500 8 GB
17% lower rating than A10G 24 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 +530% | 508.62 |
| CUDA cores | 9,216 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 1855 MHz +8% |
| RT cores | 72 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s +168% | 224 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 150 W | 125 W −17% |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−33% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
Pro W5500 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · HIP · 11 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
A10G 24 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
A10G 24 GB leads by 530.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,205 vs 509). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A10G 24 GB has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on Pro W5500 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
Pro W5500 8 GB is the lower-power option at 125 W TDP, compared with 150 W for A10G 24 GB. If render speed is close, that can make Pro W5500 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
A10G 24 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose Pro W5500 8 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 530.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: A10G 24 GB 530% faster than Pro W5500 8 GB.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 200% more VRAM than Pro W5500 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: Pro W5500 8 GB 17% lower rating than A10G 24 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A10G 24 GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while Pro W5500 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.