A10G vs RTX 3060 Ti for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and RTX 3060 Ti for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. Both GPUs can be reviewed side by side across Blender benchmark scores and estimated render times.
Fastest in Cycles
Cannot compare
Benchmark score unavailable for some GPUs
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
200% more VRAM than RTX 3060 Ti
Lowest power draw
A10G 24 GB
25% lower rating than RTX 3060 Ti
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 | N/A |
| CUDA cores | 9,216 +89% | 4,864 |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz +3% | 1665 MHz |
| RT cores | 72 +89% | 38 |
| Tensor cores | 288 +89% | 152 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s +34% | 448 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +50% | 256-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 150 W −25% | 200 W |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
RTX 3060 Ti
Scene benchmarks unavailable
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
Compare A10G 24 GB and RTX 3060 Ti by scene size, VRAM needs, power limits, and current qualifying prices. No speed winner is established without comparable benchmark evidence.
Cycles rendering performance
No speed winner is established when a score is missing or both scores are equal. Review each GPU’s benchmark details alongside VRAM and price.
VRAM and scene capacity
A10G 24 GB has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 3060 Ti. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A10G 24 GB is the lower-power option at 150 W TDP, compared with 200 W for RTX 3060 Ti. If render speed is close, that can make A10G 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
Check memory capacity, software support, power requirements, and the qualifying offers above. A missing comparable benchmark does not establish equal rendering speed.
Comparison summary
Both GPUs can be reviewed side by side across Blender benchmark scores and estimated render times.
Fastest in Cycles: Cannot compare Benchmark score unavailable for some GPUs.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 200% more VRAM than RTX 3060 Ti.
Lowest power draw: A10G 24 GB 25% lower rating than RTX 3060 Ti.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A10G 24 GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.