A10G vs RTX 4080 for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and RTX 4080 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 4080 leads the Blender benchmark score by 158.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 4080
158% faster than A10G 24 GB
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
50% more VRAM than RTX 4080
Lowest power draw
A10G 24 GB
53% lower rating than RTX 4080
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A10G 24 GB | RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $1,367.35 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 6.06 |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 | 8,283.51 +158% |
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+50% | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion−40% | 750 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 9,216 | 9,728 +6% |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 2.51 GHz +47% |
| RT cores | 72 | 113 +57% |
| Tensor cores | 288 | 304 +6% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s | 716.8 GB/s +19% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +50% | 256-bit |
| Memory speed | N/A | 22.4 Gbps |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| TDP | 150 W −53% | 320 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2022 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
RTX 4080
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 55 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 4080 is faster for Blender rendering, but A10G 24 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 4080 leads by 158.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (8,284 vs 3,205). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A10G 24 GB has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB on RTX 4080. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A10G 24 GB is the lower-power option at 150 W TDP, compared with 320 W for RTX 4080. If render speed is close, that can make A10G 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 4080 is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose A10G 24 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 4080 leads the Blender benchmark score by 158.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 4080 158% faster than A10G 24 GB.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 50% more VRAM than RTX 4080.
Lowest power draw: A10G 24 GB 53% lower rating than RTX 4080.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A10G 24 GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while RTX 4080 has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.