A10G vs RX 7650 GRE for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and RX 7650 GRE 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 161.4%.
Fastest in Cycles
A10G 24 GB
161% faster than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
200% more VRAM than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Lowest power draw
A10G 24 GB
9% lower rating than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 +161% | 1,226.09 |
| CUDA cores | 9,216 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 2695 MHz +58% |
| RT cores | 72 +125% | 32 |
| Tensor cores | 288 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s +108% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 150 W −9% | 165 W |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | 450 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · HIP · 7 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
A10G 24 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
A10G 24 GB leads by 161.4% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,205 vs 1,226). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A10G 24 GB has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 7650 GRE 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A10G 24 GB is the lower-power option at 150 W TDP, compared with 165 W for RX 7650 GRE 8 GB. If render speed is close, that can make A10G 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7650 GRE 8 GB is newer, but A10G 24 GB still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 161.4%.
Fastest in Cycles: A10G 24 GB 161% faster than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 200% more VRAM than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: A10G 24 GB 9% lower rating than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A10G 24 GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while RX 7650 GRE 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.