A10G vs RX 7700S for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and RX 7700S 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 240.6%.
Fastest in Cycles
A10G 24 GB
241% faster than RX 7700S 8 GB
Most VRAM
A10G 24 GB
200% more VRAM than RX 7700S 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RX 7700S 8 GB
33% lower rating than A10G 24 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A10G 24 GB | RX 7700S 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 +241% | 940.81 |
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 9,216 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 2500 MHz +46% |
| RT cores | 72 +125% | 32 |
| Tensor cores | 288 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s +108% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| TDP | 150 W | 100 W −33% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
RX 7700S 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · HIP · 10 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
A10G 24 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
A10G 24 GB leads by 240.6% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,205 vs 941). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A10G 24 GB has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 7700S 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RX 7700S 8 GB is the lower-power option at 100 W TDP, compared with 150 W for A10G 24 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RX 7700S 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7700S 8 GB is newer, but A10G 24 GB still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 240.6%.
Fastest in Cycles: A10G 24 GB 241% faster than RX 7700S 8 GB.
Most VRAM: A10G 24 GB 200% more VRAM than RX 7700S 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RX 7700S 8 GB 33% lower rating than A10G 24 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A10G 24 GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while RX 7700S 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.