A2 vs RTX 2050 Mobile for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A2 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 19.7%.
Fastest in Cycles
A2 16 GB
20% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Most VRAM
A2 16 GB
300% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
50% lower rating than A2 16 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 5, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.28 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 +20% | 821.41 |
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | 2,048 +60% |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz +42% | 1245 MHz |
| RT cores | 10 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 40 | 64 +60% |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+300% | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s +79% | 112 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit +100% | 64-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 60 W | 30 W −50% |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2021 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
A2 16 GB leads by 19.7% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (983 vs 821). RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB is the lower-power option at 30 W TDP, compared with 60 W for A2 16 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
A2 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 19.7%.
Fastest in Cycles: A2 16 GB 20% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Most VRAM: A2 16 GB 300% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 50% lower rating than A2 16 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.