A2 vs RTX 3070 for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and RTX 3070 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 3070 leads the Blender benchmark score by 200.7%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 3070
201% faster than A2 16 GB
Most VRAM
A2 16 GB
100% more VRAM than RTX 3070
Lowest power draw
A2 16 GB
73% lower rating than RTX 3070
Cheapest
RTX 3070
41% cheaper than A2 16 GB
Best value for money
RTX 3070
412% better value than A2 16 GB
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A2 16 GB | RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $452.16 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 1.28 | 6.54 +412% |
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 | 2,955.85 +201% |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+100% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−62% | 650 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | 5,888 +360% |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz +3% | 1725 MHz |
| RT cores | 10 | 46 +360% |
| Tensor cores | 40 | 184 +360% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s | 448 GB/s +124% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 256-bit +100% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| TDP | 60 W −73% | 220 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
RTX 3070
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 71 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 3070 is faster for Blender rendering, but A2 16 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 3070 leads by 200.7% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (2,956 vs 983). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A2 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 3070. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A2 16 GB is the lower-power option at 60 W TDP, compared with 220 W for RTX 3070. If render speed is close, that can make A2 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
A2 16 GB is newer, but RTX 3070 still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
RTX 3070 leads the Blender benchmark score by 200.7%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 3070 201% faster than A2 16 GB.
Most VRAM: A2 16 GB 100% more VRAM than RTX 3070.
Lowest power draw: A2 16 GB 73% lower rating than RTX 3070.
Cheapest: RTX 3070 41% cheaper than A2 16 GB.
Best value for money: RTX 3070 412% better value than A2 16 GB.
A2 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while RTX 3070 has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.