A2 vs RTX 5060 for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and RTX 5060 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 5060 leads the Blender benchmark score by 270.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 5060
270% faster than A2 16 GB
Most VRAM
A2 16 GB
100% more VRAM than RTX 5060
Lowest power draw
A2 16 GB
59% lower rating than RTX 5060
Cheapest
RTX 5060
40% cheaper than A2 16 GB
Best value for money
RTX 5060
519% better value than A2 16 GB
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A2 16 GB | RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $459.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 1.28 | 7.91 +519% |
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 | 3,636.7 +270% |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+100% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−55% | 550 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | 3,840 +200% |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz | 2497 MHz +41% |
| RT cores | 10 | 30 +200% |
| Tensor cores | 40 | 120 +200% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s | 448 GB/s +124% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| TDP | 60 W −59% | 145 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
RTX 5060
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 79 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 5060 is faster for Blender rendering, but A2 16 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 5060 leads by 270.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,637 vs 983). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A2 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 5060. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A2 16 GB is the lower-power option at 60 W TDP, compared with 145 W for RTX 5060. If render speed is close, that can make A2 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 5060 is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose A2 16 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 5060 leads the Blender benchmark score by 270.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 5060 270% faster than A2 16 GB.
Most VRAM: A2 16 GB 100% more VRAM than RTX 5060.
Lowest power draw: A2 16 GB 59% lower rating than RTX 5060.
Cheapest: RTX 5060 40% cheaper than A2 16 GB.
Best value for money: RTX 5060 519% better value than A2 16 GB.
A2 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while RTX 5060 has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.