A2 vs RX 7600M XT for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and RX 7600M XT 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RX 7600M XT 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 11.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
12% faster than A2 16 GB
Most VRAM
A2 16 GB
100% more VRAM than RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Lowest power draw
A2 16 GB
50% lower rating than RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A2 16 GB | RX 7600M XT 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.28 | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 | 1,099.45 +12% |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+100% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz | 2469 MHz +39% |
| RT cores | 10 | 32 +220% |
| Tensor cores | 40 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s | 288 GB/s +44% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| TDP | 60 W −50% | 120 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · HIP · 10 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is faster for Blender rendering, but A2 16 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RX 7600M XT 8 GB leads by 11.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,099 vs 983). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A2 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 7600M XT 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A2 16 GB is the lower-power option at 60 W TDP, compared with 120 W for RX 7600M XT 8 GB. If render speed is close, that can make A2 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose A2 16 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RX 7600M XT 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 11.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: RX 7600M XT 8 GB 12% faster than A2 16 GB.
Most VRAM: A2 16 GB 100% more VRAM than RX 7600M XT 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: A2 16 GB 50% lower rating than RX 7600M XT 8 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A2 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while RX 7600M XT 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.