A2 vs TITAN V for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and TITAN V for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. TITAN V leads the Blender benchmark score by 77.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
TITAN V
78% faster than A2 16 GB
Most VRAM
A2 16 GB
33% more VRAM than TITAN V
Lowest power draw
A2 16 GB
76% lower rating than TITAN V
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A2 16 GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.28 | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 | 1,744.73 +78% |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+33% | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−58% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | 5,120 +300% |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz +22% | 1455 MHz |
| RT cores | 10 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 40 | 640 +1,500% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s | 651.3 GB/s +225% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | N/A |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 3072-bit +2,300% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| TDP | 60 W −76% | 250 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2017 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
TITAN V
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 8 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
TITAN V is faster for Blender rendering, but A2 16 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
TITAN V leads by 77.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,745 vs 983). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A2 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB on TITAN V. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A2 16 GB is the lower-power option at 60 W TDP, compared with 250 W for TITAN V. If render speed is close, that can make A2 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
A2 16 GB is newer, but TITAN V still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
TITAN V leads the Blender benchmark score by 77.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: TITAN V 78% faster than A2 16 GB.
Most VRAM: A2 16 GB 33% more VRAM than TITAN V.
Lowest power draw: A2 16 GB 76% lower rating than TITAN V.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A2 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while TITAN V has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.