AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 5090 D v2 for Blender
Compare AI PRO R9700 32 GB and RTX 5090 D v2 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 5090 D v2 leads the Blender benchmark score by 348.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 5090 D v2
348% faster than AI PRO R9700 32 GB
Most VRAM
AI PRO R9700 32 GB
33% more VRAM than RTX 5090 D v2
Lowest power draw
AI PRO R9700 32 GB
48% lower rating than RTX 5090 D v2
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,699.99 Checked Oct 5, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.96 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,325.13 | 14,897.98 +348% |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 21,760 |
| Boost clock | 2920 MHz +21% | 2407 MHz |
| RT cores | 64 | 170 +166% |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 680 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+33% | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s | 1,340 GB/s +108% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 384-bit +50% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 300 W −48% | 575 W |
| System PSU | 700 W Secondary source suggestion−26% | 950 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2025 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
AI PRO R9700 32 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · HIP · 11 runs
RTX 5090 D v2
Blender 5.1.0 · OptiX · 10 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 5090 D v2 is faster for Blender rendering, but AI PRO R9700 32 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 5090 D v2 leads by 348.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (14,898 vs 3,325). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
AI PRO R9700 32 GB has more scene headroom with 32 GB of VRAM versus 24 GB on RTX 5090 D v2. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
AI PRO R9700 32 GB is the lower-power option at 300 W TDP, compared with 575 W for RTX 5090 D v2. If render speed is close, that can make AI PRO R9700 32 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 5090 D v2 is the straightforward performance pick, while AI PRO R9700 32 GB needs a price, power, availability, or compatibility advantage to make more sense.
Comparison summary
RTX 5090 D v2 leads the Blender benchmark score by 348.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 5090 D v2 348% faster than AI PRO R9700 32 GB.
Most VRAM: AI PRO R9700 32 GB 33% more VRAM than RTX 5090 D v2.
Lowest power draw: AI PRO R9700 32 GB 48% lower rating than RTX 5090 D v2.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
AI PRO R9700 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while RTX 5090 D v2 has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.