AI PRO R9700 vs TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender
Compare AI PRO R9700 32 GB and TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. AI PRO R9700 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 289.3%.
Fastest in Cycles
AI PRO R9700 32 GB
289% faster than TITAN X (Pascal)
Most VRAM
AI PRO R9700 32 GB
167% more VRAM than TITAN X (Pascal)
Lowest power draw
TITAN X (Pascal)
17% lower rating than AI PRO R9700 32 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | AI PRO R9700 32 GB | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,699.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.96 | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,325.13 +289% | 854.08 |
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+167% | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 700 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion−14% |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 3,584 |
| Boost clock | 2920 MHz +91% | 1531 MHz |
| RT cores | 64 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s +34% | 480.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 384-bit +50% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Pascal |
| TDP | 300 W | 250 W −17% |
| Release year | 2025 | 2016 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
AI PRO R9700 32 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · HIP · 11 runs
TITAN X (Pascal)
Blender 4.3.0 · OptiX · 30 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
AI PRO R9700 32 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
AI PRO R9700 32 GB leads by 289.3% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,325 vs 854). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
AI PRO R9700 32 GB has more scene headroom with 32 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB on TITAN X (Pascal). That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
TITAN X (Pascal) is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 300 W for AI PRO R9700 32 GB. If render speed is close, that can make TITAN X (Pascal) easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
AI PRO R9700 32 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN X (Pascal) would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
AI PRO R9700 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 289.3%.
Fastest in Cycles: AI PRO R9700 32 GB 289% faster than TITAN X (Pascal).
Most VRAM: AI PRO R9700 32 GB 167% more VRAM than TITAN X (Pascal).
Lowest power draw: TITAN X (Pascal) 17% lower rating than AI PRO R9700 32 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
AI PRO R9700 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while TITAN X (Pascal) has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.