CMP 30HX vs H200 NVL for Blender
Compare CMP 30HX 6 GB and H200 NVL 141 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. H200 NVL 141 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 652.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
H200 NVL 141 GB
653% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Most VRAM
H200 NVL 141 GB
2,250% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Lowest power draw
CMP 30HX 6 GB
79% lower rating than H200 NVL 141 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | CMP 30HX 6 GB | H200 NVL 141 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 765.06 | 5,760.19 +653% |
| VRAM | 6 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 141 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+2,250% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−70% | 1000 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,408 | 16,896 +1,100% |
| Boost clock | 1785 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 528 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 4,890 GB/s +1,355% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | N/A |
| Memory bus | 192-bit | 6144-bit +3,100% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Hopper |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 125 W −79% | 600 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2024 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 30HX 6 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 12 runs
H200 NVL 141 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 9 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
H200 NVL 141 GB leads by 652.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (5,760 vs 765). CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
CMP 30HX 6 GB is the lower-power option at 125 W TDP, compared with 600 W for H200 NVL 141 GB. If render speed is close, that can make CMP 30HX 6 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
H200 NVL 141 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 652.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: H200 NVL 141 GB 653% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Most VRAM: H200 NVL 141 GB 2,250% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Lowest power draw: CMP 30HX 6 GB 79% lower rating than H200 NVL 141 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.