CMP 30HX vs L4 for Blender
Compare CMP 30HX 6 GB and L4 24 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. L4 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 350.6%.
Fastest in Cycles
L4 24 GB
351% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Most VRAM
L4 24 GB
300% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Lowest power draw
L4 24 GB
42% lower rating than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | CMP 30HX 6 GB | L4 24 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $3,995.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 0.86 |
| Blender benchmark score | 765.06 | 3,446.99 +351% |
| VRAM | 6 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+300% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−17% |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,408 | 7,424 +427% |
| Boost clock | 1785 MHz | 2040 MHz +14% |
| RT cores | N/A | 60 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 240 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s +12% | 300.1 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 125 W | 72 W −42% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 30HX 6 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 12 runs
L4 24 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 8 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
L4 24 GB leads by 350.6% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,447 vs 765). CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
L4 24 GB is the lower-power option at 72 W TDP, compared with 125 W for CMP 30HX 6 GB. If render speed is close, that can make L4 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
L4 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 350.6%.
Fastest in Cycles: L4 24 GB 351% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Most VRAM: L4 24 GB 300% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Lowest power draw: L4 24 GB 42% lower rating than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.