CMP 30HX vs PRO W6800 for Blender
Compare CMP 30HX 6 GB and PRO W6800 32 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 154.4%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W6800 32 GB
154% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W6800 32 GB
433% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Lowest power draw
CMP 30HX 6 GB
50% lower rating than PRO W6800 32 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | CMP 30HX 6 GB | PRO W6800 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 1.18 |
| Blender benchmark score | 765.06 | 1,946.06 +154% |
| VRAM | 6 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+433% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−50% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,408 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1785 MHz | 2322 MHz +30% |
| RT cores | N/A | 60 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 512 GB/s +52% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 192-bit | 256-bit +33% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| TDP | 125 W −50% | 250 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 30HX 6 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 12 runs
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W6800 32 GB leads by 154.4% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,946 vs 765). CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
CMP 30HX 6 GB is the lower-power option at 125 W TDP, compared with 250 W for PRO W6800 32 GB. If render speed is close, that can make CMP 30HX 6 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 154.4%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W6800 32 GB 154% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W6800 32 GB 433% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Lowest power draw: CMP 30HX 6 GB 50% lower rating than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.