CMP 30HX vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell for Blender
Compare CMP 30HX 6 GB and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 409.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
409% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Most VRAM
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
167% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
44% lower rating than CMP 30HX 6 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | CMP 30HX 6 GB | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $1,618.99 Checked Oct 4, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 2.41 |
| Blender benchmark score | 765.06 | 3,894.44 +409% |
| VRAM | 6 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+167% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−17% |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,408 | 4,352 +209% |
| Boost clock | 1785 MHz | 1957 MHz +10% |
| RT cores | N/A | 34 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 136 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s +17% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory bus | 192-bit +50% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 125 W | 70 W −44% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 30HX 6 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 12 runs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 6 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB leads by 409.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,894 vs 765). CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB is the lower-power option at 70 W TDP, compared with 125 W for CMP 30HX 6 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 409.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB 409% faster than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Most VRAM: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB 167% more VRAM than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB 44% lower rating than CMP 30HX 6 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 30HX 6 GB (6 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.