CMP 40HX vs Pro W5500 for Blender
Compare CMP 40HX 8 GB and Pro W5500 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. CMP 40HX 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 130.2%.
Fastest in Cycles
CMP 40HX 8 GB
130% faster than Pro W5500 8 GB
Most VRAM
Tie
Same memory capacity
Lowest power draw
Pro W5500 8 GB
32% lower rating than CMP 40HX 8 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | CMP 40HX 8 GB | Pro W5500 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,170.87 +130% | 508.62 |
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−33% |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 2,304 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1650 MHz | 1855 MHz +12% |
| RT cores | 36 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s +100% | 224 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit +100% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| TDP | 185 W | 125 W −32% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 40HX 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 5 runs
Pro W5500 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · HIP · 11 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
CMP 40HX 8 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here, and both cards have the same VRAM capacity.
Cycles rendering performance
CMP 40HX 8 GB leads by 130.2% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,171 vs 509). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
Both cards have 8 GB of VRAM, so the decision is less about scene capacity and more about render speed, architecture, power draw, and price.
Power ratings and cooling
Pro W5500 8 GB is the lower-power option at 125 W TDP, compared with 185 W for CMP 40HX 8 GB. If render speed is close, that can make Pro W5500 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 40HX 8 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose Pro W5500 8 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
CMP 40HX 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 130.2%.
Fastest in Cycles: CMP 40HX 8 GB 130% faster than Pro W5500 8 GB.
Most VRAM: Tie Same memory capacity.
Lowest power draw: Pro W5500 8 GB 32% lower rating than CMP 40HX 8 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
Both GPUs ship with 8 GB of VRAM, so the tradeoff is more about speed, architecture, and efficiency than memory capacity.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.