CMP 40HX vs RTX 2050 Mobile for Blender
Compare CMP 40HX 8 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. CMP 40HX 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 42.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
CMP 40HX 8 GB
43% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Most VRAM
CMP 40HX 8 GB
100% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
84% lower rating than CMP 40HX 8 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | CMP 40HX 8 GB | RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,170.87 +43% | 821.41 |
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM+100% | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA, OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 2,304 +13% | 2,048 |
| Boost clock | 1650 MHz +33% | 1245 MHz |
| RT cores | 36 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 +350% | 64 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s +300% | 112 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit +300% | 64-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| TDP | 185 W | 30 W −84% |
| Release year | 2021 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 40HX 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 5 runs
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
CMP 40HX 8 GB leads by 42.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,171 vs 821). RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB is the lower-power option at 30 W TDP, compared with 185 W for CMP 40HX 8 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
CMP 40HX 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 42.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: CMP 40HX 8 GB 43% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Most VRAM: CMP 40HX 8 GB 100% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 84% lower rating than CMP 40HX 8 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.