CMP 40HX vs TITAN V for Blender
Compare CMP 40HX 8 GB and TITAN V for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. TITAN V leads the Blender benchmark score by 49.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
TITAN V
49% faster than CMP 40HX 8 GB
Most VRAM
TITAN V
50% more VRAM than CMP 40HX 8 GB
Lowest power draw
CMP 40HX 8 GB
26% lower rating than TITAN V
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 1,170.87 | 1,744.73 +49% |
| CUDA cores | 2,304 | 5,120 +122% |
| Boost clock | 1650 MHz +13% | 1455 MHz |
| RT cores | 36 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 288 | 640 +122% |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM+50% |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 651.3 GB/s +45% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | N/A |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 3072-bit +1,100% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 185 W −26% | 250 W |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion−25% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2017 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
CMP 40HX 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 5 runs
TITAN V
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 8 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
TITAN V is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
TITAN V leads by 49.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,745 vs 1,171). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
TITAN V has more scene headroom with 12 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on CMP 40HX 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
CMP 40HX 8 GB is the lower-power option at 185 W TDP, compared with 250 W for TITAN V. If render speed is close, that can make CMP 40HX 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
CMP 40HX 8 GB is newer, but TITAN V still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
TITAN V leads the Blender benchmark score by 49.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: TITAN V 49% faster than CMP 40HX 8 GB.
Most VRAM: TITAN V 50% more VRAM than CMP 40HX 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: CMP 40HX 8 GB 26% lower rating than TITAN V.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
CMP 40HX 8 GB has 8 GB of VRAM, while TITAN V has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.