MX350 vs PRO W7900 for Blender
Compare MX350 2 GB and PRO W7900 48 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 3818.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
3,819% faster than MX350 2 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
2,300% more VRAM than MX350 2 GB
Lowest power draw
MX350 2 GB
93% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | MX350 2 GB | PRO W7900 48 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 92.34 | 3,618.68 +3,819% |
| VRAM | 2 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+2,300% |
| System PSU | N/A | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 640 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 937 MHz | 2495 MHz +166% |
| RT cores | N/A | 96 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 864 GB/s +1,441% |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 384-bit +500% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| TDP | 20 W −93% | 295 W |
| Release year | 2020 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
MX350 2 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 7 runs
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 3818.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 92). MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
MX350 2 GB is the lower-power option at 20 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make MX350 2 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 3818.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 3,819% faster than MX350 2 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 2,300% more VRAM than MX350 2 GB.
Lowest power draw: MX350 2 GB 93% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.