MX350 vs RX 7900 XTX for Blender
Compare MX350 2 GB and RX 7900 XTX for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RX 7900 XTX leads the Blender benchmark score by 5319.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
RX 7900 XTX
5,320% faster than MX350 2 GB
Most VRAM
RX 7900 XTX
1,100% more VRAM than MX350 2 GB
Lowest power draw
MX350 2 GB
94% lower rating than RX 7900 XTX
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | MX350 2 GB | RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $1,799.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 2.78 |
| Blender benchmark score | 92.34 | 5,004.78 +5,320% |
| VRAM | 2 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+1,100% |
| System PSU | N/A | 800 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | HIP |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 640 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 937 MHz | 2498 MHz +167% |
| RT cores | N/A | 96 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 960 GB/s +1,612% |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 384-bit +500% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3 |
| TDP | 20 W −94% | 355 W |
| Release year | 2020 | 2022 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
MX350 2 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 7 runs
RX 7900 XTX
Blender 5.2.0 · HIP · 49 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
RX 7900 XTX leads by 5319.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (5,005 vs 92). MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
MX350 2 GB is the lower-power option at 20 W TDP, compared with 355 W for RX 7900 XTX. If render speed is close, that can make MX350 2 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
RX 7900 XTX leads the Blender benchmark score by 5319.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: RX 7900 XTX 5,320% faster than MX350 2 GB.
Most VRAM: RX 7900 XTX 1,100% more VRAM than MX350 2 GB.
Lowest power draw: MX350 2 GB 94% lower rating than RX 7900 XTX.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
MX350 2 GB (2 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.