Pro VII vs PRO W7900 for Blender
Compare Pro VII 16 GB and PRO W7900 48 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 237.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
237% faster than Pro VII 16 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
200% more VRAM than Pro VII 16 GB
Lowest power draw
Pro VII 16 GB
15% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | Pro VII 16 GB | PRO W7900 48 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,073.86 | 3,618.68 +237% |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Performance | ||
| Boost clock | 1700 MHz | 2495 MHz +47% |
| RT cores | N/A | 96 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 1,020 GB/s +18% | 864 GB/s |
| Memory type | N/A | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 4096-bit +967% | 384-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 250 W −15% | 295 W |
| Release year | 2020 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
Pro VII 16 GB
Blender 4.2.0 · HIP · 6 runs
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 237.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 1,074). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB on Pro VII 16 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
Pro VII 16 GB is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make Pro VII 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W7900 48 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose Pro VII 16 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 237.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 237% faster than Pro VII 16 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 200% more VRAM than Pro VII 16 GB.
Lowest power draw: Pro VII 16 GB 15% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
Pro VII 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.