Pro VII vs TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender
Compare Pro VII 16 GB and TITAN X (Pascal) for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. Pro VII 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 25.7%.
Fastest in Cycles
Pro VII 16 GB
26% faster than TITAN X (Pascal)
Most VRAM
Pro VII 16 GB
33% more VRAM than TITAN X (Pascal)
Lowest power draw
Tie
Same power rating
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | Pro VII 16 GB | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,073.86 +26% | 854.08 |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+33% | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 3,584 |
| Boost clock | 1700 MHz +11% | 1531 MHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 1,020 GB/s +112% | 480.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | N/A | GDDR5X |
| Memory bus | 4096-bit +967% | 384-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| TDP | 250 W | 250 W |
| Release year | 2020 | 2016 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
Pro VII 16 GB
Blender 4.2.0 · HIP · 6 runs
TITAN X (Pascal)
Blender 4.3.0 · OptiX · 30 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
Pro VII 16 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
Pro VII 16 GB leads by 25.7% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,074 vs 854). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
Pro VII 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB on TITAN X (Pascal). That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
Both cards list a 250 W TDP, so power draw is not the deciding spec on paper. Cooling, case airflow, and actual board partner limits still matter.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
Pro VII 16 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN X (Pascal) would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
Pro VII 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 25.7%.
Fastest in Cycles: Pro VII 16 GB 26% faster than TITAN X (Pascal).
Most VRAM: Pro VII 16 GB 33% more VRAM than TITAN X (Pascal).
Lowest power draw: Tie Same power rating.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
Pro VII 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while TITAN X (Pascal) has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.