Pro W5500 vs RTX 4090 for Blender
Compare Pro W5500 8 GB and RTX 4090 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 4090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 2174.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 4090
2,175% faster than Pro W5500 8 GB
Most VRAM
RTX 4090
200% more VRAM than Pro W5500 8 GB
Lowest power draw
Pro W5500 8 GB
72% lower rating than RTX 4090
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | Pro W5500 8 GB | RTX 4090 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $3,995.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 2.90 |
| Blender benchmark score | 508.62 | 11,570.69 +2,175% |
| VRAM | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% |
| System PSU | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−65% | 850 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 16,384 |
| Boost clock | 1855 MHz | 2.52 GHz +36% |
| RT cores | N/A | 128 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 512 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 1,010 GB/s +351% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 384-bit +200% |
| Memory speed | N/A | 21 Gbps |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| TDP | 125 W −72% | 450 W |
| Release year | 2020 | 2022 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
Pro W5500 8 GB
Blender 4.4.0 · HIP · 11 runs
RTX 4090
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 61 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 4090 is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 4090 leads by 2174.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (11,571 vs 509). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 4090 has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on Pro W5500 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
Pro W5500 8 GB is the lower-power option at 125 W TDP, compared with 450 W for RTX 4090. If render speed is close, that can make Pro W5500 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 4090 is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose Pro W5500 8 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX 4090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 2174.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 4090 2,175% faster than Pro W5500 8 GB.
Most VRAM: RTX 4090 200% more VRAM than Pro W5500 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: Pro W5500 8 GB 72% lower rating than RTX 4090.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
Pro W5500 8 GB has 8 GB of VRAM, while RTX 4090 has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.