PRO W6400 vs PRO W6800 for Blender
Compare PRO W6400 4 GB and PRO W6800 32 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 560.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W6800 32 GB
560% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W6800 32 GB
700% more VRAM than PRO W6400 4 GB
Lowest power draw
PRO W6400 4 GB
80% lower rating than PRO W6800 32 GB
Cheapest
PRO W6400 4 GB
85% cheaper than PRO W6800 32 GB
Best value for money
PRO W6400 4 GB
<1% better value than PRO W6800 32 GB
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W6400 4 GB | PRO W6800 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $248.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 1.18 +<1% | 1.18 |
| Blender benchmark score | 294.81 | 1,946.06 +560% |
| VRAM | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+700% |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−58% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Performance | ||
| Boost clock | 2321 MHz | 2322 MHz +<1% |
| RT cores | 12 | 60 +400% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 512 GB/s +300% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 256-bit +300% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 50 W −80% | 250 W |
| Release year | 2022 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6400 4 GB
Blender 4.1.0 · HIP · 6 runs
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W6800 32 GB leads by 560.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,946 vs 295). PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W6400 4 GB is the lower-power option at 50 W TDP, compared with 250 W for PRO W6800 32 GB. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W6400 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 560.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W6800 32 GB 560% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W6800 32 GB 700% more VRAM than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: PRO W6400 4 GB 80% lower rating than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Cheapest: PRO W6400 4 GB 85% cheaper than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Best value for money: PRO W6400 4 GB <1% better value than PRO W6800 32 GB.
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.