PRO W6400 vs RTX 2050 Mobile for Blender
Compare PRO W6400 4 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 178.6%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
179% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB
Most VRAM
Tie
Same memory capacity
Lowest power draw
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
40% lower rating than PRO W6400 4 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W6400 4 GB | RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $248.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.18 | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 294.81 | 821.41 +179% |
| VRAM | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA, OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 2,048 |
| Boost clock | 2321 MHz +86% | 1245 MHz |
| RT cores | 12 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 64 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s +14% | 112 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| TDP | 50 W | 30 W −40% |
| Release year | 2022 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6400 4 GB
Blender 4.1.0 · HIP · 6 runs
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB leads by 178.6% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (821 vs 295). PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB is the lower-power option at 30 W TDP, compared with 50 W for PRO W6400 4 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 178.6%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 179% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Most VRAM: Tie Same memory capacity.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 40% lower rating than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility. RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.