PRO W6400 vs RTX 3090 for Blender
Compare PRO W6400 4 GB and RTX 3090 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 3090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 1628.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 3090
1,629% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB
Most VRAM
RTX 3090
500% more VRAM than PRO W6400 4 GB
Lowest power draw
PRO W6400 4 GB
86% lower rating than RTX 3090
Cheapest
PRO W6400 4 GB
87% cheaper than RTX 3090
Best value for money
RTX 3090
119% better value than PRO W6400 4 GB
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W6400 4 GB | RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $248.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $1,969.99 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 1.18 | 2.59 +119% |
| Blender benchmark score | 294.81 | 5,096.96 +1,629% |
| VRAM | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+500% |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−67% | 750 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 10,496 |
| Boost clock | 2321 MHz +37% | 1.70 GHz |
| RT cores | 12 | 82 +583% |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 328 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s +631% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 384-bit +500% |
| Memory speed | N/A | 19.5 Gbps |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| TDP | 50 W −86% | 350 W |
| Release year | 2022 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6400 4 GB
Blender 4.1.0 · HIP · 6 runs
RTX 3090
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 85 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 3090 leads by 1628.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (5,097 vs 295). PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W6400 4 GB is the lower-power option at 50 W TDP, compared with 350 W for RTX 3090. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W6400 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
RTX 3090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 1628.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 3090 1,629% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Most VRAM: RTX 3090 500% more VRAM than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: PRO W6400 4 GB 86% lower rating than RTX 3090.
Cheapest: PRO W6400 4 GB 87% cheaper than RTX 3090.
Best value for money: RTX 3090 119% better value than PRO W6400 4 GB.
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.