PRO W6400 vs TITAN RTX for Blender
Compare PRO W6400 4 GB and TITAN RTX for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. TITAN RTX leads the Blender benchmark score by 983.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
TITAN RTX
983% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB
Most VRAM
TITAN RTX
500% more VRAM than PRO W6400 4 GB
Lowest power draw
PRO W6400 4 GB
82% lower rating than TITAN RTX
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $248.99 Checked Oct 5, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.18 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 294.81 | 3,193.21 +983% |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 4,608 |
| Boost clock | 2321 MHz +31% | 1770 MHz |
| RT cores | 12 | 72 +500% |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 576 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+500% |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 672 GB/s +425% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 64-bit | 384-bit +500% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 50 W −82% | 280 W |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−58% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2022 | 2018 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6400 4 GB
Blender 4.1.0 · HIP · 6 runs
TITAN RTX
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 13 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
TITAN RTX leads by 983.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,193 vs 295). PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W6400 4 GB is the lower-power option at 50 W TDP, compared with 280 W for TITAN RTX. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W6400 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
TITAN RTX leads the Blender benchmark score by 983.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: TITAN RTX 983% faster than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Most VRAM: TITAN RTX 500% more VRAM than PRO W6400 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: PRO W6400 4 GB 82% lower rating than TITAN RTX.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W6400 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.