PRO W6800 vs PRO W7900 for Blender
Compare PRO W6800 32 GB and PRO W7900 48 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 85.9%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
86% faster than PRO W6800 32 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
50% more VRAM than PRO W6800 32 GB
Lowest power draw
PRO W6800 32 GB
15% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W6800 32 GB | PRO W7900 48 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.18 | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,946.06 | 3,618.68 +86% |
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+50% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Performance | ||
| Boost clock | 2322 MHz | 2495 MHz +7% |
| RT cores | 60 | 96 +60% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 864 GB/s +69% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 384-bit +50% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 250 W −15% | 295 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 85.9% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 1,946). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 32 GB on PRO W6800 32 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W6800 32 GB is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W6800 32 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W7900 48 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose PRO W6800 32 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 85.9%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 86% faster than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 50% more VRAM than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Lowest power draw: PRO W6800 32 GB 15% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W6800 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.