PRO W6800 vs RTX 3080 for Blender
Compare PRO W6800 32 GB and RTX 3080 10 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 3080 10 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 116.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 3080 10 GB
116% faster than PRO W6800 32 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W6800 32 GB
220% more VRAM than RTX 3080 10 GB
Lowest power draw
PRO W6800 32 GB
22% lower rating than RTX 3080 10 GB
Cheapest
RTX 3080 10 GB
61% cheaper than PRO W6800 32 GB
Best value for money
RTX 3080 10 GB
447% better value than PRO W6800 32 GB
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W6800 32 GB | RTX 3080 10 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $651.08 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 1.18 | 6.46 +447% |
| Blender benchmark score | 1,946.06 | 4,203.46 +116% |
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+220% | 10 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion−20% | 750 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 8,704 |
| Boost clock | 2322 MHz +36% | 1710 MHz |
| RT cores | 60 | 68 +13% |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 272 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s +48% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 320-bit +25% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| TDP | 250 W −22% | 320 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
RTX 3080 10 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 62 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 3080 10 GB is faster for Blender rendering, but PRO W6800 32 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 3080 10 GB leads by 116.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (4,203 vs 1,946). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6800 32 GB has more scene headroom with 32 GB of VRAM versus 10 GB on RTX 3080 10 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W6800 32 GB is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 320 W for RTX 3080 10 GB. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W6800 32 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6800 32 GB is newer, but RTX 3080 10 GB still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
RTX 3080 10 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 116.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 3080 10 GB 116% faster than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W6800 32 GB 220% more VRAM than RTX 3080 10 GB.
Lowest power draw: PRO W6800 32 GB 22% lower rating than RTX 3080 10 GB.
Cheapest: RTX 3080 10 GB 61% cheaper than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Best value for money: RTX 3080 10 GB 447% better value than PRO W6800 32 GB.
PRO W6800 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while RTX 3080 10 GB has 10 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.