PRO W6800 vs RX 7600M XT for Blender
Compare PRO W6800 32 GB and RX 7600M XT 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 77.0%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W6800 32 GB
77% faster than RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W6800 32 GB
300% more VRAM than RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
52% lower rating than PRO W6800 32 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 5, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.18 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 1,946.06 +77% | 1,099.45 |
| Boost clock | 2322 MHz | 2469 MHz +6% |
| RT cores | 60 +88% | 32 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+300% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s +78% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit +100% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 250 W | 120 W −52% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2021 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · HIP · 10 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W6800 32 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W6800 32 GB leads by 77.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,946 vs 1,099). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6800 32 GB has more scene headroom with 32 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 7600M XT 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is the lower-power option at 120 W TDP, compared with 250 W for PRO W6800 32 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RX 7600M XT 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is newer, but PRO W6800 32 GB still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 77.0%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W6800 32 GB 77% faster than RX 7600M XT 8 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W6800 32 GB 300% more VRAM than RX 7600M XT 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RX 7600M XT 8 GB 52% lower rating than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W6800 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while RX 7600M XT 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.