PRO W6800 vs TITAN RTX for Blender
Compare PRO W6800 32 GB and TITAN RTX for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. TITAN RTX leads the Blender benchmark score by 64.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
TITAN RTX
64% faster than PRO W6800 32 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W6800 32 GB
33% more VRAM than TITAN RTX
Lowest power draw
PRO W6800 32 GB
11% lower rating than TITAN RTX
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 5, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.18 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 1,946.06 | 3,193.21 +64% |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 4,608 |
| Boost clock | 2322 MHz +31% | 1770 MHz |
| RT cores | 60 | 72 +20% |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 576 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+33% | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 672 GB/s +31% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 384-bit +50% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 250 W −11% | 280 W |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2018 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
TITAN RTX
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 13 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
TITAN RTX is faster for Blender rendering, but PRO W6800 32 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
TITAN RTX leads by 64.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,193 vs 1,946). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6800 32 GB has more scene headroom with 32 GB of VRAM versus 24 GB on TITAN RTX. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
PRO W6800 32 GB is the lower-power option at 250 W TDP, compared with 280 W for TITAN RTX. If render speed is close, that can make PRO W6800 32 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6800 32 GB is newer, but TITAN RTX still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
TITAN RTX leads the Blender benchmark score by 64.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: TITAN RTX 64% faster than PRO W6800 32 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W6800 32 GB 33% more VRAM than TITAN RTX.
Lowest power draw: PRO W6800 32 GB 11% lower rating than TITAN RTX.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W6800 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while TITAN RTX has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.