PRO W7900 vs RTX 2050 Mobile for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 340.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
341% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
1,100% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
90% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 +341% | 821.41 |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 2,048 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz +100% | 1245 MHz |
| RT cores | 96 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 64 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+1,100% | 4 GB Below Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +671% | 112 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +500% | 64-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 295 W | 30 W −90% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2023 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 340.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 821). RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB is the lower-power option at 30 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 340.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 341% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 1,100% more VRAM than RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB 90% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB (4 GB) meets Blender’s 2 GB VRAM minimum but is below its 8 GB recommendation. Check scene memory needs and GPU compatibility.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.