PRO W7900 vs RTX 3050 OEM for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 157.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
157% faster than RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
500% more VRAM than RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB
56% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W7900 48 GB | RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 +157% | 1,407.71 |
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+500% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−50% |
| Render support | OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 2,304 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz +42% | 1755 MHz |
| RT cores | 96 +433% | 18 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 72 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +286% | 224 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| TDP | 295 W | 130 W −56% |
| Release year | 2023 | 2022 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB
Blender 4.2.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 157.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 1,408). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB is the lower-power option at 130 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W7900 48 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 157.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 157% faster than RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 500% more VRAM than RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB 56% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while RTX 3050 OEM 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.