PRO W7900 vs RTX 3060 Ti for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RTX 3060 Ti for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. Both GPUs can be reviewed side by side across Blender benchmark scores and estimated render times.
Fastest in Cycles
Cannot compare
Benchmark score unavailable for some GPUs
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
500% more VRAM than RTX 3060 Ti
Lowest power draw
RTX 3060 Ti
32% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | PRO W7900 48 GB | RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 | N/A |
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+500% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | N/A | 4,864 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz +50% | 1665 MHz |
| RT cores | 96 +153% | 38 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 152 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +93% | 448 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +50% | 256-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| TDP | 295 W | 200 W −32% |
| Release year | 2023 | 2020 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RTX 3060 Ti
Scene benchmarks unavailable
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RTX 3060 Ti by scene size, VRAM needs, power limits, and current qualifying prices. No speed winner is established without comparable benchmark evidence.
Cycles rendering performance
No speed winner is established when a score is missing or both scores are equal. Review each GPU’s benchmark details alongside VRAM and price.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 3060 Ti. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 3060 Ti is the lower-power option at 200 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 3060 Ti easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
Check memory capacity, software support, power requirements, and the qualifying offers above. A missing comparable benchmark does not establish equal rendering speed.
Comparison summary
Both GPUs can be reviewed side by side across Blender benchmark scores and estimated render times.
Fastest in Cycles: Cannot compare Benchmark score unavailable for some GPUs.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 500% more VRAM than RTX 3060 Ti.
Lowest power draw: RTX 3060 Ti 32% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.