PRO W7900 vs RX 6700M for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RX 6700M 10 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 348.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
348% faster than RX 6700M 10 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
380% more VRAM than RX 6700M 10 GB
Lowest power draw
RX 6700M 10 GB
54% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 +348% | 806.88 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz +4% | 2400 MHz |
| RT cores | 96 +167% | 36 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+380% | 10 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +170% | 320 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +140% | 160-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 295 W | 135 W −54% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2023 | 2021 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RX 6700M 10 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · HIP · 13 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 348.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 807). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 10 GB on RX 6700M 10 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RX 6700M 10 GB is the lower-power option at 135 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RX 6700M 10 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W7900 48 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose RX 6700M 10 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 348.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 348% faster than RX 6700M 10 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 380% more VRAM than RX 6700M 10 GB.
Lowest power draw: RX 6700M 10 GB 54% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while RX 6700M 10 GB has 10 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.