PRO W7900 vs RX 7650 GRE for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and RX 7650 GRE 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 195.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
195% faster than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
500% more VRAM than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
44% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 +195% | 1,226.09 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz | 2695 MHz +8% |
| RT cores | 96 +200% | 32 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+500% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +200% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 295 W | 165 W −44% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 450 W Secondary source suggestion−25% |
| Release year | 2023 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
RX 7650 GRE 8 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · HIP · 7 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 195.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 1,226). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 7650 GRE 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RX 7650 GRE 8 GB is the lower-power option at 165 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RX 7650 GRE 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7650 GRE 8 GB is newer, but PRO W7900 48 GB still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 195.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 195% faster than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 500% more VRAM than RX 7650 GRE 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RX 7650 GRE 8 GB 44% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while RX 7650 GRE 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.