PRO W7900 vs TITAN RTX for Blender
Compare PRO W7900 48 GB and TITAN RTX for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 13.3%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W7900 48 GB
13% faster than TITAN RTX
Most VRAM
PRO W7900 48 GB
100% more VRAM than TITAN RTX
Lowest power draw
TITAN RTX
5% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,618.68 +13% | 3,193.21 |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 4,608 |
| Boost clock | 2495 MHz +41% | 1770 MHz |
| RT cores | 96 +33% | 72 |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 576 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+100% | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 864 GB/s +29% | 672 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 295 W | 280 W −5% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2023 | 2018 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W7900 48 GB
Blender 3.6.0 · HIP · 5 runs
TITAN RTX
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 13 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W7900 48 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W7900 48 GB leads by 13.3% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,619 vs 3,193). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W7900 48 GB has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 24 GB on TITAN RTX. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
TITAN RTX is the lower-power option at 280 W TDP, compared with 295 W for PRO W7900 48 GB. If render speed is close, that can make TITAN RTX easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W7900 48 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN RTX would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
PRO W7900 48 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 13.3%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W7900 48 GB 13% faster than TITAN RTX.
Most VRAM: PRO W7900 48 GB 100% more VRAM than TITAN RTX.
Lowest power draw: TITAN RTX 5% lower rating than PRO W7900 48 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W7900 48 GB has 48 GB of VRAM, while TITAN RTX has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.