A10G vs TITAN RTX for Blender
Compare A10G 24 GB and TITAN RTX for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 0.4%.
Fastest in Cycles
A10G 24 GB
<1% faster than TITAN RTX
Most VRAM
Tie
Same memory capacity
Lowest power draw
A10G 24 GB
46% lower rating than TITAN RTX
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 3,204.76 +<1% | 3,193.21 |
| CUDA cores | 9,216 +100% | 4,608 |
| Boost clock | 1710 MHz | 1770 MHz +4% |
| RT cores | 72 | 72 |
| Tensor cores | 288 | 576 +100% |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s | 672 GB/s +12% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 150 W −46% | 280 W |
| System PSU | 450 W Secondary source suggestion−25% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2018 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A10G 24 GB
Blender 3.2.1 · OptiX · 7 runs
TITAN RTX
Blender 4.4.0 · OptiX · 13 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
A10G 24 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here, and both cards have the same VRAM capacity.
Cycles rendering performance
A10G 24 GB leads by 0.4% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (3,205 vs 3,193). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
Both cards have 24 GB of VRAM, so the decision is less about scene capacity and more about render speed, architecture, power draw, and price.
Power ratings and cooling
A10G 24 GB is the lower-power option at 150 W TDP, compared with 280 W for TITAN RTX. If render speed is close, that can make A10G 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
A10G 24 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN RTX would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
A10G 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 0.4%.
Fastest in Cycles: A10G 24 GB <1% faster than TITAN RTX.
Most VRAM: Tie Same memory capacity.
Lowest power draw: A10G 24 GB 46% lower rating than TITAN RTX.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
Both GPUs ship with 24 GB of VRAM, so the tradeoff is more about speed, architecture, and efficiency than memory capacity.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.