Back to GPU compare

GTX 1630 vs RTX 4080 for Blender

Compare GTX 1630 and RTX 4080 for Blender rendering. See benchmark scores, VRAM, memory bandwidth, power draw, and estimated OptiX/CUDA render times side by side on Renderjuice. RTX 4080 leads the Blender benchmark score by 3192.4%.

265.26
4 GB
2022
8,733.36
16 GB
2022

GPU 3

Fastest in Blender

RTX 4080 (8,733.36 score)

Most VRAM

RTX 4080 (16 GB)

Lowest power draw

GTX 1630 (75 W TDP)

Spec
Performance
Blender benchmark score
265.26
-97%
8,733.36
CUDA cores
512
-95%
9,728
Boost clock
1785 MHz
-29%
2.51 GHz
RT cores
N/A
113 RT Cores (3rd Gen)
Tensor cores
N/A
304 Tensor Cores (4th Gen)
Memory
VRAM
4 GB
-75%
16 GB
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
-87%
716.8 GB/s
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory bus
64-bit
-75%
256-bit
Memory speed
N/A
22.4 Gbps
Platform
Architecture
Turing
Ada Lovelace
Render support
OptiX
OptiX, CUDA
TDP
75 W
320 W
+327%
Release year
2022
2022

Benchmark comparison

Estimated seconds to render one frame of each standard Blender benchmark scene. Lower is faster.

seconds
Bars show single-frame benchmark estimates, not a full animation.
GTX 1630
RTX 4080

These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.

Quick take on GTX 1630 vs RTX 4080

RTX 4080 leads the Blender benchmark score by 3192.4%.

Fastest in Blender: RTX 4080 8,733.36 score.

Most VRAM: RTX 4080 16 GB.

Lowest power draw: GTX 1630 75 W TDP.

GTX 1630 has 4 GB of VRAM, while RTX 4080 has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.

If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.

renderjuice

© Renderjuice 2026 All rights reserved.