H200 NVL vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell for Blender
Compare H200 NVL 141 GB and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 14.4%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB
14% faster than H200 NVL 141 GB
Most VRAM
H200 NVL 141 GB
488% more VRAM than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB
Lowest power draw
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB
77% lower rating than H200 NVL 141 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | $3,194.00 Checked Oct 2, 2026 |
| Value for money | N/A | 2.06 |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 5,760.19 | 6,586.97 +14% |
| CUDA cores | 16,896 +89% | 8,960 |
| Boost clock | 1785 MHz | 2055 MHz +15% |
| RT cores | N/A | 70 |
| Tensor cores | 528 +89% | 280 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 141 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+488% | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes |
| Memory bandwidth | 4,890 GB/s +628% | 672 GB/s |
| Memory type | N/A | GDDR7 |
| Memory bus | 6144-bit +3,100% | 192-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Hopper | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | CUDA, OpenCL |
| TDP | 600 W | 140 W −77% |
| System PSU | 1000 W Secondary source suggestion | 300 W Secondary source suggestion−70% |
| Release year | 2024 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
H200 NVL 141 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 9 runs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 7 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB is faster for Blender rendering, but H200 NVL 141 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB leads by 14.4% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (6,587 vs 5,760). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
H200 NVL 141 GB has more scene headroom with 141 GB of VRAM versus 24 GB on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB is the lower-power option at 140 W TDP, compared with 600 W for H200 NVL 141 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose H200 NVL 141 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 14.4%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB 14% faster than H200 NVL 141 GB.
Most VRAM: H200 NVL 141 GB 488% more VRAM than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB 77% lower rating than H200 NVL 141 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
H200 NVL 141 GB has 141 GB of VRAM, while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB has 24 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.