Pro VII vs RX 7600M XT for Blender
Compare Pro VII 16 GB and RX 7600M XT 8 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RX 7600M XT 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 2.4%.
Fastest in Cycles
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
2% faster than Pro VII 16 GB
Most VRAM
Pro VII 16 GB
100% more VRAM than RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Lowest power draw
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
52% lower rating than Pro VII 16 GB
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | N/A | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 1,073.86 | 1,099.45 +2% |
| Boost clock | 1700 MHz | 2469 MHz +45% |
| RT cores | N/A | 32 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+100% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,020 GB/s +254% | 288 GB/s |
| Memory type | N/A | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 4096-bit +3,100% | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Render support | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| TDP | 250 W | 120 W −52% |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | N/A |
| Release year | 2020 | 2023 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
Pro VII 16 GB
Blender 4.2.0 · HIP · 6 runs
RX 7600M XT 8 GB
Blender 4.5.0 · HIP · 10 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is faster for Blender rendering, but Pro VII 16 GB has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Cycles rendering performance
RX 7600M XT 8 GB leads by 2.4% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,099 vs 1,074). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
Pro VII 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RX 7600M XT 8 GB. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is the lower-power option at 120 W TDP, compared with 250 W for Pro VII 16 GB. If render speed is close, that can make RX 7600M XT 8 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7600M XT 8 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose Pro VII 16 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RX 7600M XT 8 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 2.4%.
Fastest in Cycles: RX 7600M XT 8 GB 2% faster than Pro VII 16 GB.
Most VRAM: Pro VII 16 GB 100% more VRAM than RX 7600M XT 8 GB.
Lowest power draw: RX 7600M XT 8 GB 52% lower rating than Pro VII 16 GB.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
Pro VII 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while RX 7600M XT 8 GB has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.