PRO W6800 vs TITAN V for Blender
Compare PRO W6800 32 GB and TITAN V for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 11.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
PRO W6800 32 GB
12% faster than TITAN V
Most VRAM
PRO W6800 32 GB
167% more VRAM than TITAN V
Lowest power draw
Tie
Same power rating
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $1,649.96 Checked Oct 2, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.18 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 1,946.06 +12% | 1,744.73 |
| CUDA cores | N/A | 5,120 |
| Boost clock | 2322 MHz +60% | 1455 MHz |
| RT cores | 60 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 640 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 32 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+167% | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 651.3 GB/s +27% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | N/A |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 3072-bit +1,100% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Volta |
| Render support | OpenCL | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 250 W | 250 W |
| System PSU | 600 W Secondary source suggestion | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2017 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
PRO W6800 32 GB
Blender 4.0.0 · HIP · 8 runs
TITAN V
Blender 4.5.0 · OptiX · 8 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
PRO W6800 32 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
PRO W6800 32 GB leads by 11.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,946 vs 1,745). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
PRO W6800 32 GB has more scene headroom with 32 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB on TITAN V. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
Both cards list a 250 W TDP, so power draw is not the deciding spec on paper. Cooling, case airflow, and actual board partner limits still matter.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
PRO W6800 32 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN V would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
PRO W6800 32 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 11.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: PRO W6800 32 GB 12% faster than TITAN V.
Most VRAM: PRO W6800 32 GB 167% more VRAM than TITAN V.
Lowest power draw: Tie Same power rating.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
PRO W6800 32 GB has 32 GB of VRAM, while TITAN V has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.