RTX 4090 vs RTX 5050 for Blender
Compare RTX 4090 and RTX 5050 for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RTX 4090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 319.1%.
Fastest in Cycles
RTX 4090
319% faster than RTX 5050
Most VRAM
RTX 4090
200% more VRAM than RTX 5050
Lowest power draw
RTX 5050
71% lower rating than RTX 4090
Cheapest
RTX 5050
91% cheaper than RTX 4090
Best value for money
RTX 5050
158% better value than RTX 4090
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | RTX 4090 | RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $3,995.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $369.99 Checked Oct 7, 2026 |
| Value for money | 2.90 | 7.46 +158% |
| Blender benchmark score | 11,570.69 +319% | 2,760.54 |
| VRAM | 24 GB More capacity for heavy scenes+200% | 8 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| System PSU | 850 W Manufacturer requirement | 550 W Manufacturer requirement−35% |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 16,384 +540% | 2,560 |
| Boost clock | 2.52 GHz | 2572 MHz +2% |
| RT cores | 128 +540% | 20 |
| Tensor cores | 512 +540% | 80 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 1,010 GB/s +216% | 320 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit +200% | 128-bit |
| Memory speed | 21 Gbps | N/A |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 450 W | 130 W −71% |
| Release year | 2022 | 2025 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
RTX 4090
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 61 runs
RTX 5050
Blender 5.2.0 · OptiX · 22 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RTX 4090 is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
RTX 4090 leads by 319.1% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (11,571 vs 2,761). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
RTX 4090 has more scene headroom with 24 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on RTX 5050. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
RTX 5050 is the lower-power option at 130 W TDP, compared with 450 W for RTX 4090. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 5050 easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RTX 5050 is newer, but RTX 4090 still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Comparison summary
RTX 4090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 319.1%.
Fastest in Cycles: RTX 4090 319% faster than RTX 5050.
Most VRAM: RTX 4090 200% more VRAM than RTX 5050.
Lowest power draw: RTX 5050 71% lower rating than RTX 4090.
Cheapest: RTX 5050 91% cheaper than RTX 4090.
Best value for money: RTX 5050 158% better value than RTX 4090.
RTX 4090 has 24 GB of VRAM, while RTX 5050 has 8 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.