Back to GPU compare

RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090 for Blender

Compare RTX 3090 and RTX 4090 for Blender rendering. See benchmark scores, VRAM, memory bandwidth, power draw, and estimated OptiX/CUDA render times side by side on Renderjuice. RTX 4090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 100.6%.

5,830.25
24 GB
2020
11,697.62
24 GB
2022

GPU 3

Fastest in Blender

RTX 4090 (11,697.62 score)

Most VRAM

RTX 4090 (24 GB)

Lowest power draw

RTX 3090 (350 W TDP)

Spec
Performance
Blender benchmark score
5,830.25
-50%
11,697.62
CUDA cores
10,496
-36%
16,384
Boost clock
1.70 GHz
-33%
2.52 GHz
RT cores
82 RT Cores (2nd Gen)
-36%
128 RT Cores (3rd Gen)
Tensor cores
328 Tensor Cores (3rd Gen)
-36%
512 Tensor Cores (4th Gen)
Memory
VRAM
24 GB
24 GB
Memory bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
-7%
1,010 GB/s
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR6X
Memory bus
384-bit
384-bit
Memory speed
19.5 Gbps
-7%
21 Gbps
Platform
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Render support
OptiX, CUDA
OptiX, CUDA
TDP
350 W
450 W
+29%
Release year
2020
2022

Benchmark comparison

Estimated render times for standard Blender benchmark scenes. Lower is faster.

RTX 3090
RTX 4090

These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.

Quick take on RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090

RTX 4090 leads the Blender benchmark score by 100.6%.

Fastest in Blender: RTX 4090 11,697.62 score.

Most VRAM: RTX 4090 24 gb.

Lowest power draw: RTX 3090 350 w tdp.

Both GPUs ship with 24 GB of VRAM, so the tradeoff is more about speed, architecture, and efficiency than memory capacity.

If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.

renderjuice

© Renderjuice 2026 All rights reserved.