A2 vs RX 7600 XT for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and RX 7600 XT 16 GB for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. RX 7600 XT 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 3.5%.
Fastest in Cycles
RX 7600 XT 16 GB
3% faster than A2 16 GB
Most VRAM
Tie
Same memory capacity
Lowest power draw
A2 16 GB
68% lower rating than RX 7600 XT 16 GB
Cheapest
A2 16 GB
3% cheaper than RX 7600 XT 16 GB
Best value for money
RX 7600 XT 16 GB
<1% better value than A2 16 GB
GPU comparison
Key specifications for Blender rendering.
| Spec | A2 16 GB | RX 7600 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 | $795.00 Checked Oct 9, 2026 |
| Value for money | 1.28 | 1.28 +<1% |
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 | 1,016.88 +3% |
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−58% | 600 W Manufacturer requirement |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Performance | ||
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | N/A |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz | 2755 MHz +56% |
| RT cores | 10 | 32 +220% |
| Tensor cores | 40 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s | 288 GB/s +44% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| TDP | 60 W −68% | 190 W |
| Release year | 2021 | 2024 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
RX 7600 XT 16 GB
Blender 5.1.1 · HIP · 5 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
RX 7600 XT 16 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here, and both cards have the same VRAM capacity.
Cycles rendering performance
RX 7600 XT 16 GB leads by 3.5% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (1,017 vs 983). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
Both cards have 16 GB of VRAM, so the decision is less about scene capacity and more about render speed, architecture, power draw, and price.
Power ratings and cooling
A2 16 GB is the lower-power option at 60 W TDP, compared with 190 W for RX 7600 XT 16 GB. If render speed is close, that can make A2 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
RX 7600 XT 16 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose A2 16 GB would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
RX 7600 XT 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 3.5%.
Fastest in Cycles: RX 7600 XT 16 GB 3% faster than A2 16 GB.
Most VRAM: Tie Same memory capacity.
Lowest power draw: A2 16 GB 68% lower rating than RX 7600 XT 16 GB.
Cheapest: A2 16 GB 3% cheaper than RX 7600 XT 16 GB.
Best value for money: RX 7600 XT 16 GB <1% better value than A2 16 GB.
Both GPUs ship with 16 GB of VRAM, so the tradeoff is more about speed, architecture, and efficiency than memory capacity.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.