A2 vs TITAN Xp for Blender
Compare A2 16 GB and TITAN Xp for Blender Cycles. See benchmark performance, VRAM, power ratings and checked prices side by side. A2 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 4.2%.
Fastest in Cycles
A2 16 GB
4% faster than TITAN Xp
Most VRAM
A2 16 GB
33% more VRAM than TITAN Xp
Lowest power draw
A2 16 GB
76% lower rating than TITAN Xp
Cheapest
Cannot compare
Price unavailable for some GPUs
Best value for money
Cannot compare
Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lowest price | $770.00 Checked Oct 2, 2026 | Price unavailable No current offer matches your preferences. |
| Value for money | 1.28 | N/A |
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 982.86 +4% | 942.86 |
| CUDA cores | 1,280 | 3,840 +200% |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz +12% | 1582 MHz |
| RT cores | 10 | N/A |
| Tensor cores | 40 | N/A |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB More headroom for complex scenes+33% | 12 GB Meets Blender’s recommended VRAM |
| Memory bandwidth | 200.1 GB/s | 547.6 GB/s +174% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | 384-bit +200% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Render support | CUDA, OpenCL | OptiX |
| TDP | 60 W −76% | 250 W |
| System PSU | 250 W Secondary source suggestion−58% | 600 W Secondary source suggestion |
| Release year | 2021 | 2017 |
Blender Cycles benchmarks
Estimated seconds / frame Lower is faster
A2 16 GB
Blender 3.5.0 · OptiX · 6 runs
TITAN Xp
Blender 4.2.0 · OptiX · 15 runs
Junkshop
Monster
Classroom
Which GPU should you choose for Blender?
A2 16 GB is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Cycles rendering performance
A2 16 GB leads by 4.2% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (983 vs 943). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene capacity
A2 16 GB has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB on TITAN Xp. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power ratings and cooling
A2 16 GB is the lower-power option at 60 W TDP, compared with 250 W for TITAN Xp. If render speed is close, that can make A2 16 GB easier to cool and run quietly.
Is the upgrade worthwhile?
A2 16 GB is both the newer and faster Blender rendering choice here. The main reason to choose TITAN Xp would be price, availability, existing ownership, or a specific workstation requirement.
Comparison summary
A2 16 GB leads the Blender benchmark score by 4.2%.
Fastest in Cycles: A2 16 GB 4% faster than TITAN Xp.
Most VRAM: A2 16 GB 33% more VRAM than TITAN Xp.
Lowest power draw: A2 16 GB 76% lower rating than TITAN Xp.
Cheapest: Cannot compare Price unavailable for some GPUs.
Best value for money: Cannot compare Price or benchmark unavailable for some GPUs.
A2 16 GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while TITAN Xp has 12 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.